The Commonwealth argues that publishing the unredacted judgment would compromise that ongoing process, by putting information into the public domain before the issue has been fully concluded in the ACT supreme court. It is still possible that the ACT supreme court will decide to conduct parts of it in a closed court, if it is convinced by secret evidence, which not even Collaery has seen, from heads of Australian intelligence agencies, and the departments of foreign affairs and home affairs. Sign up to receive the top stories from Guardian Australia every morning
Sign up to receive an email with the top stories from Guardian Australia every morning
#Risk and international relations books trial
The courts are still deciding precisely how much of Collaery’s trial will be held in open court. The government acknowledges that open justice is of “undoubted importance”.īut it said that national security must be given the greatest weight when deciding what information can be disclosed to the public through the National Security Information (NSI) Act, which governs how courts handle sensitive information. “The result is that, unless special leave is granted and the Redaction judgment is overturned, information the disclosure of which is likely to prejudice national security will be made public,” the document says.
In its application to the high court, obtained by the Human Rights Law Centre senior lawyer Kieran Pender and seen by Guardian Australia, the government argues allowing the public to see the unredacted judgment would “prejudice national security”. This project explores the immigration practices of the Trump administration, particularly the travel ban and wall along the border with Mexico, through a security logic of risk.When the court’s chief justice, Helen Murrell, refused to do so, lawyers for the attorney general, Michaelia Cash, took the remarkable step of seeking the high court’s intervention.
#Risk and international relations books tv
It focuses on debates over representations of identity politics in games, film, and TV shows. This project explores the the ways in which audiences constitute pop cultural artefacts through debates and contests over the meaning of artefact's representational practices. He is also the author of Risk and Hierarchy in International Society: Liberal Interventionism in the Post-Cold War Era (Palgrave, 2014). He has published on risk, international intervention and international hierarchy in journals such as the Politics, European Journal of International Security, and the Australian Journal of International Affairs. The thesis explored interventions conducted by Western societies in the post-Cold War era that aimed to promote liberal democratic institutions and governance and their impact on the constitution of international society.
William was awarded his PhD from Murdoch University in 2010. He has research interests in English School and constructivist International Relations theory, sovereignty, international hierarchy, risk in International Relations, international intervention in the post-Cold War era, the security and defence policies of the United States, European Union, and Australia and popular culture in global politics. William Clapton is a Senior Lecturer in International Relations in the School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, UNSW.
0 kommentar(er)
